* App parts
* work
* work
* work
* work
* work
* work
* Update aspnetcore/mvc/advanced/app-parts/3.0sample1/MySharedApp/MySharedApp.csproj
Co-Authored-By: Kirk Larkin <6025110+serpent5@users.noreply.github.com>
* work
* work
* work
* Update aspnetcore/mvc/advanced/app-parts/3.0sample1/WebAppParts/Startup.cs
Co-Authored-By: Pranav K <prkrishn@hotmail.com>
* react to pranavkam feedback
* react to pranavkam feedback
* react to pranavkam feedback
* react to pranavkam feedback
* Update aspnetcore/mvc/advanced/app-parts/3.0sample1/WebAppParts/Startup2.cs
Co-Authored-By: Pranav K <prkrishn@hotmail.com>
* overview
* whats new to end
* fix migration node
* split fundamentals, move to end
* glob & loc, get started
* security node name
* security section
* azure, client-side, host
* several more sections
* redistribute tutorials
* proofread fixes
* move how to download section
* index files delete and redirect
* fix errors
* reorder some nodes
* scott feedback, flatten main tutorials node
* fix missed feedback items + other issues
* unflatten tutorials node
* move 'how to download'
* more tutorials node tweaks
* standardize view sample links
* db --> DB
* fix build error
* remove link from a parent node
* streamline node names
* xref links
* typos
* typo
* typos and revert some xref links
* scott feedback
* scott feedback
* feedback
* change node name
* safe storage-->protect
Fixes#9219
@JunTaoLuo Dan calls out the implicit versioning "for 2.1 SDK or later;" however, we don't usually version the doc content by SDK release. We might need to say something for this update in the passage that I'm adding to the All topic (*aspnetcore/fundamentals/metapackage.md*) about which SDK version this applies to. I don't know if that's something that you would like to do or what version to call out.
I also remove the version from the samples. We also assume that devs are using the latest SDK with our samples.
Hello, @ardalis,
This proposed file change comes from https://github.com/aspnet/Docs.pt-br/pull/81 .
Could you review this contribution and help to merge if agreed?
Many thanks in advance.
When creating a new PR, please do the following and delete this template text:
* Reference the issue number if there is one:
Fixes #Issue_Number
> The "Fixes #nnn" syntax in the PR description causes
> GitHub to automatically close the issue when this PR is merged.