From 87f6b8e19d61079bdcd11f1f6c12e1190c6ab2e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Alexander Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:14:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo (Emscriptem to Emscripten). --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 4eb06305..05b24552 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ No. * the only way to interpret the grammars and get anywhere near original fidelity is to use the exact same regular expression library (with its custom syntax constructs) * in VSCode, our runtime is node.js and we can use a node native module that exposes the library to JavaScript * in Monaco, we are constrained to a browser environment where we cannot do anything similar -* we have experimented with Emscriptem to compile the C library to asm.js, but performance was very poor even in Firefox (10x slower) and extremely poor in Chrome (100x slower). +* we have experimented with Emscripten to compile the C library to asm.js, but performance was very poor even in Firefox (10x slower) and extremely poor in Chrome (100x slower). * we can revisit this once WebAssembly gets traction in the major browsers, but we will still need to consider the browser matrix we support. i.e. if we support IE11 and only Edge will add WebAssembly support, what will the experience be in IE11, etc. ## Dev