V8 seems to be particularly slow converting an undefined value to false
in BooleanValue.
Revert this when we upgrade to V8 3.17, or whenever the fix discussed
in http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=2487 lands in V8.
Problem 1: If stream.push() triggers a 'readable' event, and the user
calls `read(n)` with some n > the highWaterMark, then the push() will
return false (indicating that they should not push any more), but no
future 'readable' event is coming (because we're above the
highWaterMark).
Solution: return true from push() when needReadable is set.
Problem 2: A read(n) for n != 0, after the stream had encountered an
EOF, would not trigger the 'end' event if the EOF was pushed in
synchronously by the _read() function.
Solution: Check for ended in stream.read() and schedule an end event if
the length now equals 0.
Fix#4585
Improved assert check order of execution and added additional checks on
parameters to ensure no bad values make it through (e.g. negative offset
values).
Improvements:
* floating point operations are approx 4x's faster
* Now write quiet NaN's
* all read/write on floating point now done in C, so no more need for
lib/buffer_ieee754.js
* float values have more accurate min/max value checks
* add additional benchmarks for buffers read/write
* created benchmark/_bench_timer.js which is a simple library that
can be included into any benchmark and provides an intelligent tracker
for sync and async tests
* add benchmarks for DataView set methods
* add checks and tests to make sure offset is greater than 0
There was previously an assert() in there, but this part of the code is
so high-volume that the added cost made a measurable dent in http_simple.
Just checking inline is fine, though, and prevents a lot of potential
hazards.
Say that a stream's current read queue has 101 bytes in it, and the
underlying resource has ended (ie, reached EOF).
If you do something like this:
stream.read(100); // leave a byte behind
stream.read(0); // read(0) for some reason
then the read(0) will get 0 from the howMuchToRead function. Since the
stream was ended, this was incorrectly treating the 0 as a "there is no
more in the buffer", and emitting 'end' before that last byte was read.
Why have the read(0) in the first place? We do this in some cases to
trigger the last few bytes of a net socket (such as a child process's
stdio pipes). This was causing issues when piping a `git archive` job
to a file: the resulting tarball was incomplete, because it occasionally
was not getting the last chunk.
Remove compiler switches from $(TOPLEVEL)/deps/v8/build/common.gypi,
we set them globally in $(TOPLEVEL)/common.gypi.
Commit 7b4d95a introduced the switches again, resulting in V8 getting
built without any optimizations.
This commit is essentially a rehash of commit 4b8629d.
The int8_t and uint8_t typedefs on sunos/smartos depend on a number of
compiler directives. Avoid ambiguity and specify signed and unsigned
char explicitly.
Fixes the following build error:
../src/stream_wrap.cc: In static member function 'static void*
node::WriteWrap::operator new(size_t)':
../src/stream_wrap.cc:70:49: warning: no return statement in function
returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
In file included from ../src/v8_typed_array.cc:26:0:
../src/v8_typed_array_bswap.h: In function 'T
v8_typed_array::SwapBytes(T) [with T = signed char]':
../src/v8_typed_array_bswap.h:150:23: instantiated from 'T
v8_typed_array::LoadAndSwapBytes(void*) [with T = signed char]'
../src/v8_typed_array.cc:694:7: instantiated from 'static
v8::Handle<v8::Value> {anonymous}::DataView::getGeneric(const
v8::Arguments&) [with T = signed char]'
../src/v8_typed_array.cc:738:40: instantiated from here
../src/v8_typed_array_bswap.h:125:16: error: size of array is
negative
For example, to cross-compile from my OS X laptop for Raspberry Pi, you would
do something like:
$ make binary BINARYNAME=node-v`python tools/getnodeversion.py`-linux-arm-pi \
DESTCPU=arm CONFIG_FLAGS="--dest-os=linux"
This also slightly changes the semantics, in that a 'readable'
event may be triggered by the first write() call, even if a
user has not yet called read().
This happens because the Transform _write() handler is calling
read(0) to start the flow of data. Technically, the new behavior
is more 'correct', since it is more in line with the semantics
of the 'readable' event in other streams.
isaacs
Felix Böhm
Ryunosuke SATO
Dean McNamee
James Campos
Trevor Norris
Alexandr Emelin
Mathias Bynens
Ben Noordhuis
Fedor Indutny
Bert Belder
yangguo@chromium.org
Nathan Rajlich
Scott Blomquist
Andreas Madsen