The DTrace probes were updated to accomodate platforms that can't
handle structs, update the prototypes for ETW but it's not necessary
to do anything with the new arguments as it's redundant information.
OSX and other DTrace implementations don't support dereferencing
structs in probes. To accomodate that pass members from the struct as
arguments so that DTrace is useful on those systems.
If an http response has an 'end' handler that throws, then the socket
will never be released back into the pool.
Granted, we do NOT guarantee that throwing will never have adverse
effects on Node internal state. Such a guarantee cannot be reasonably
made in a shared-global mutable-state side-effecty language like
JavaScript. However, in this case, it's a rather trivial patch to
increase our resilience a little bit, so it seems like a win.
There is no semantic change in this case, except that some event
listeners are removed, and the `'free'` event is emitted on nextTick, so
that you can schedule another request which will re-use the same socket.
From the user's point of view, there should be no detectable difference.
Closes#5107
The tests did not agree with the test comments. Tests first and second
were both testing the !state.reading case. Now second tests the
state.reading && state.length case.
Fixesjoyent/node#5183
The v0.8 Stream.pipe() method automatically destroyed the destination
stream whenever the src stream closed. However, this caused a lot of
problems, and was removed by popular demand. (Many userland modules
still have a no-op destroy() method just because of this.) It was also
very hazardous because this would be done even if { end: false } was
passed in the pipe options.
In v0.10, we decided that the 'close' event and destroy() method are
application-specific, and pipe() doesn't automatically call destroy().
However, TLS actually depended (silently) on this behavior. So, in this
case, we should just go ahead and destroy the thing when close happens.
Closes#5145
In cases where a stream may have data added to the read queue before the
user adds a 'readable' event, there is never any indication that it's
time to start reading.
True, there's already data there, which the user would get if they
checked However, as we use 'readable' event listening as the signal to
start the flow of data with a read(0) call internally, we ought to
trigger the same effect (ie, emitting a 'readable' event) even if the
'readable' listener is added after the first emission.
To avoid confusing weirdness, only the *first* 'readable' event listener
is granted this privileged status. After we've started the flow (or,
alerted the consumer that the flow has started) we don't need to start
it again. At that point, it's the consumer's responsibility to consume
the stream.
Closes#5141
A llvm/clang bug on Darwin ia32 makes these tests fail 100% of
the time. Since no one really seems to mind overly much, and we
can't reasonably fix this in node anyway, just accept both types
of NaN for now.
Calling `this.pair.encrypted._internallyPendingBytes()` before
handling/resetting error will result in assertion failure:
../src/node_crypto.cc:962: void node::crypto::Connection::ClearError():
Assertion `handle_->Get(String::New("error"))->BooleanValue() == false'
failed.
see #5058
Microsoft's IIS doesn't support it, and is not replying with ServerHello
after receiving ClientHello which contains it.
The good way might be allowing to opt-out this at runtime from
javascript-land, but unfortunately OpenSSL doesn't support it right now.
see #5119
Since _tickCallback and _tickDomainCallback were both called from
MakeCallback, it was possible for a callback to be called that required
a domain directly to _tickCallback.
The fix was to implement process.usingDomains(). This will set all
applicable functions to their domain counterparts, and set a flag in cc
to let MakeCallback know domain callbacks always need to be checked.
Added test in own file. It's important that the test remains isolated.
It's possible to read multiple messages off the parent/child channel.
When that happens, make sure that recvHandle is cleared after emitting
the first message so it doesn't get emitted twice.
Commit f53441a added crypto.getCiphers() as a function that returns the
names of SSL ciphers.
Commit 14a6c4e then added crypto.getHashes(), which returns the names of
digest algorithms, but that creates a subtle inconsistency: the return
values of crypto.getHashes() are valid arguments to crypto.createHash()
but that is not true for crypto.getCiphers() - the returned values are
only valid for SSL/TLS functions.
Rectify that by adding tls.getCiphers() and making crypto.getCiphers()
return proper cipher names.
isaacs
Fedor Indutny
Timothy J Fontaine
Ben Noordhuis
Dave Pacheco
Brian White
Andrew Hart
Michael Hart
Mitar
Nathan Rajlich
Bert Belder
wicked
Benjamin Ruston
Trevor Norris
Mathias Bynens