PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54536
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Original commit message:
[riscv] avoid cpu probing in li_ptr
CPU probing is an expensive thing to do and we should avoid doing it upon every li_ptr call.
Fixes performance regresion bisected in https://github.com/riscv-forks/electron/issues/1
Change-Id: Ib5ff89b2a730e08de6735123ae60adeffe811ed8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5612950
Commit-Queue: Yahan Lu <yahan@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Yahan Lu <yahan@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#94349}
Refs: a3cc8522a4
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53412
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52293
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/51362
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Original commit message:
[logging] Bugfix: LinuxPerfBasicLogger should log JS functions
This patch fixes a typo that was introduced in commit
c51041f45400928cd64fbc8f389c0dd0dd15f82f /
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336793, which reversed the behavior of the perf_basic_prof_only_functions flag.
This also refactors the equivalent guard in LinuxPerfJitLogger to use the same inline CodeKind API for identifying JS Functions. This is unrelated to the bug, but it seems a fair rider to add on here.
Bug: v8:14387
Change-Id: I25766b0d45f4c65dfec5ae01e094a1ed94111054
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4954225
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#90501}
Refs: f7d000a7ae
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50302
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Debadree Chatterjee <debadree333@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50115
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Original commit message:
[logging] Bugfix: LinuxPerfBasicLogger should log JS functions
This patch fixes a typo that was introduced in commit
c51041f45400928cd64fbc8f389c0dd0dd15f82f /
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2336793, which reversed the behavior of the perf_basic_prof_only_functions flag.
This also refactors the equivalent guard in LinuxPerfJitLogger to use the same inline CodeKind API for identifying JS Functions. This is unrelated to the bug, but it seems a fair rider to add on here.
Bug: v8:14387
Change-Id: I25766b0d45f4c65dfec5ae01e094a1ed94111054
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4954225
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#90501}
Refs: f7d000a7ae
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50302
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Debadree Chatterjee <debadree333@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
Fix build issue, remove unneeded include uchar.h.
Follow the conversation on:
https://groups.google.com/g/v8-dev/c/nsbshwlmP3c.
The `uchar.h` include is not necessary.
It was added to get the definition of char16_t but that's an intrinsic
type in C++.
Change-Id: I0aaa11dba0be3ccad15b9e421f8bae71450d443b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4823404
Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Eric Leese <leese@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Leese <leese@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#89787}
Refs: 1a3ecc2483
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49639
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49639
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
Add an `v8::ArrayBuffer::WasDetached` method to the C++ API
V8's C++ API does not give a way to tell whether an ArrayBuffer has
been detached from the `v8::ArrayBuffer` class. In fact, as far as can
be told from the C++ API without running JS code, detached
ArrayBuffers behave the same as zero-sized ArrayBuffers and there is
no way to observe the difference. However, this difference can be
observed in JS because constructing a TypedArray from a detached
ArrayBuffer will throw.
This change adds a `WasDetached` method to the `v8::ArrayBuffer` class
to give embedders access to this information without having to run JS
code.
Bug: v8:13159
Change-Id: I2bb1e380cee1cecd31f6d48ec3d9f28c03a8a673
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3810345
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#83963}
Refs: 9df5ef70ff
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/45474
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daeyeon Jeong <daeyeon.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
[msvc] fix missing include <optional>
clang/clang-cl compiled happily (probably included transitively this
header), but not MSVC.
Bug: v8:13312
Change-Id: I69b6c15f76d8ef13e4fac33f733717429ba96f71
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3913033
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#83402}
Refs: 0cccb6f27d
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/44741
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42657
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41610
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40178
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
[date] Fix Date#getMinutes() test failures
After building V8 using Clang (./out/x64.release/v8_build_config.json
says that "is_clang" is true), I could reproduce the referenced bug
report locally. Replacing the getMinutes() calls with getUTCMinutes()
calls fixed the test failure.
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Bug: v8:11200
Change-Id: Ia36be481f2c8728380d550ead856ef8e51b1069c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3093362
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76367}
Refs: 00bb1a77c0
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <darshan.sen@postman.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39829
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
[date] Fix Date#getMinutes() test failures
After building V8 using Clang (./out/x64.release/v8_build_config.json
says that "is_clang" is true), I could reproduce the referenced bug
report locally. Replacing the getMinutes() calls with getUTCMinutes()
calls fixed the test failure.
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Bug: v8:11200
Change-Id: Ia36be481f2c8728380d550ead856ef8e51b1069c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3093362
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76367}
Refs: 00bb1a77c0
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <darshan.sen@postman.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39829
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39469
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
[date] Fix Date#getMinutes() test failures
After building V8 using Clang (./out/x64.release/v8_build_config.json
says that "is_clang" is true), I could reproduce the referenced bug
report locally. Replacing the getMinutes() calls with getUTCMinutes()
calls fixed the test failure.
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Bug: v8:11200
Change-Id: Ia36be481f2c8728380d550ead856ef8e51b1069c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3093362
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76367}
Refs: 00bb1a77c0
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <darshan.sen@postman.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39829
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
Reland "[api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context"
This is a reland of d5457f5fb7ea05ca05a697599ffa50d35c1ae3c7
after a speculative revert.
Additionally it fixes an issue with throwing promise hooks.
Original change's description:
> [api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context
>
> This will enable Node.js to get much better performance from async_hooks
> as currently PromiseHook delegates to C++ for the hook function and then
> Node.js delegates it right back to JavaScript, introducing several
> unnecessary barrier hops in code that gets called very, very frequently
> in modern, promise-heavy applications.
>
> This API mirrors the form of the original C++ function based PromiseHook
> API, however it is intentionally separate to allow it to use JSFunctions
> triggered within generated code to, as much as possible, avoid entering
> runtime functions entirely.
>
> Because PromiseHook has internal use also, beyond just the Node.js use,
> I have opted to leave the existing API intact and keep this separate to
> avoid conflicting with any possible behaviour expectations of other API
> users.
>
> The design ideas for this new API stemmed from discussion with some V8
> team members at a previous Node.js Diagnostics Summit hosted by Google
> in Munich, and the relevant documentation of the discussion can be found
> here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g8OrG5lMIUhRn1zbkutgY83MiTSMx-0NHDs8Bf-nXxM/edit#heading=h.w1bavzz80l1e
>
> A summary of the reasons for why this new design is important can be
> found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vtgoT4_kjgOr-Bl605HR2T6_SC-C8uWzYaOPDK5pmRo/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11025
> Change-Id: I0b403b00c37d3020b5af07b654b860659d3a7697
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2759188
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73858}
Bug: v8:11025
Bug: chromium:1197475
Change-Id: I73a71e97d9c3dff89a2b092c3fe4adff81ede8ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2823917
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74071}
Refs: c0fceaa066
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38273
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38273
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me>
Original commit message:
Reland "[api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context"
This is a reland of d5457f5fb7ea05ca05a697599ffa50d35c1ae3c7
after a speculative revert.
Additionally it fixes an issue with throwing promise hooks.
Original change's description:
> [api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context
>
> This will enable Node.js to get much better performance from async_hooks
> as currently PromiseHook delegates to C++ for the hook function and then
> Node.js delegates it right back to JavaScript, introducing several
> unnecessary barrier hops in code that gets called very, very frequently
> in modern, promise-heavy applications.
>
> This API mirrors the form of the original C++ function based PromiseHook
> API, however it is intentionally separate to allow it to use JSFunctions
> triggered within generated code to, as much as possible, avoid entering
> runtime functions entirely.
>
> Because PromiseHook has internal use also, beyond just the Node.js use,
> I have opted to leave the existing API intact and keep this separate to
> avoid conflicting with any possible behaviour expectations of other API
> users.
>
> The design ideas for this new API stemmed from discussion with some V8
> team members at a previous Node.js Diagnostics Summit hosted by Google
> in Munich, and the relevant documentation of the discussion can be found
> here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g8OrG5lMIUhRn1zbkutgY83MiTSMx-0NHDs8Bf-nXxM/edit#heading=h.w1bavzz80l1e
>
> A summary of the reasons for why this new design is important can be
> found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vtgoT4_kjgOr-Bl605HR2T6_SC-C8uWzYaOPDK5pmRo/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11025
> Change-Id: I0b403b00c37d3020b5af07b654b860659d3a7697
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2759188
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73858}
Bug: v8:11025
Bug: chromium:1197475
Change-Id: I73a71e97d9c3dff89a2b092c3fe4adff81ede8ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2823917
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74071}
Refs: c0fceaa066
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36394
Reviewed-By: Bryan English <bryan@bryanenglish.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
[aarm64] Fix GetSharedLibraryAddresses
This patch fixes a segmentation fault which occurs when using `--prof` flag on a Darwin ARM64 architecture.
See https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/36656
Change-Id: Idc3ce6c8fd8a24f76f1b356f629e37340045b51e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2609413
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72886}
Refs: 8957d4677a
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37330
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
Fix GetSharedLibraryAddresses
This patch fixes a segmentation fault which occurs when using `--prof` flag on a Darwin ARM64 architecture.
See https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/36656
Change-Id: Idc3ce6c8fd8a24f76f1b356f629e37340045b51e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2609413
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72886}
Refs: 8957d4677a
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/36656
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37471
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ash Cripps <acripps@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Original commit message:
GCC: explicitely instantiate JSObject::ApplyAttributesToDictionary for NumberDictionary
elements.cc invokes ApplyAttributesToDictionary using NumberDictionary as its template
parameter. But the declaration of the template method is in js-object.cc, so nobody
can actually compile the version for number dictionary. This is fixed requesting
explicit instantiation for NumberDictionary.
This was breaking GCC build.
Bug: chromium:819294
Change-Id: I685ddc5b97e129d1a534dbdb04025c0932bc5ecd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1649565
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: José Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62097}
Refs: 3b8c624bda
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28016
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann (רפאל פלחי) <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Michaël Zasso
kxxt
Luke Albao
Debadree Chatterjee
Yagiz Nizipli
Jiawen Geng
Ray Wang
Darshan Sen
Stephen Belanger
Antoine du Hamel
Matheus Marchini
Myles Borins